Prehardened
Mold Steels offer Machinability and Weldability
By Stuart Caren, contributing editorFor
decades P-20 has been the most widely used steel for making large plastic injection
molds. It offers a good
combination of hardness, machinability, and toughness, but its properties are not always
consistent. Frequently, the hardness isn't uniform thoughout a block, which leads to
machining problems, and it is difficult to weld.
In
the past few years, tool steels that are easier to machine and
weld have been developed. One of these new materials is a
precipitation hardening steel of uniform microstructure and
hardness that was developed by Prof. Asada and Dr. Watanabe of
Daido Industrial College in Nagoya, Japan. This material was
introduced to the plastics industry in 1965 as NAK 80. Although
NAK 80 is considerably harder than P-20 (40 Rockwell C compared
with 32 Rockwell C for P-20), it reportedly machines 15-20%
faster than P-20 and can be polished to a Class I optic-quality
finish.
To further improve machinability, a
small amount of sulfur was added to NAK 80 to produce a new grade of
steel called NAK 55. Some NAK 55 users report as much as a 50%
reduction in machining time. According to Dave Hunt, vice president
of engineering at Hunt Machine (Talmadge, OH), NAK 55 is "the best
machining prehardened steel I've ever cut."
The success of NAK 80 and NAK 55 is
only partially attributable to their excellent machinability.
Usually, a mistake in the mold or part design must be corrected by
welding. It is very difficult to weld, polish, and retexture the
surface of P-20 without the welded area being visible in the steel
and in the molded part. If the mistake occurs in a highly polished
or textured area, the entire cavity may need to be scrapped. The
mold made from NAK, when proper procedures and NAK-W welding rods
are used, will have uniform hardness across the weld. This allows
the toolmaker to purposefully match the polish or etch.
Roland Krevitt, tooling engineer from
Apple Computer (Santa Clara, CA), explains it this way: "In today's
business environment, it is crucial that we shorten the time to
market for new products as much as is humanly possible. Because of
this constant pressure, we are usually forced to build molds while
the parts are being designed. This means we make a lot of changes to
our molds, both during the construction and after the try-out. If
NAK was not available, we would be in trouble. Our ability to make
these changes, sometimes in an already textured area, has saved us
countless times. We have also found that NAK etches much better than
other mold steels."
Then combination of machinability and
weldability is the main reason moldmakers select NAK over P-20 in
spite of it's higher cost. According to Tom Schade, vice president
and general manager for International Mold Steels (Erlanger, KY),
the U.S. distributor for Daido Steel Co. Ltd., NAK 55 and NAK 80 are
used for over 90% of all prehardened molds build in Japan and are
rapidly becoming the materials of choice for moldmakers around the
world. This is confirmed by people like Dave Hunt of Hunt Machine
and Ed Noggle of Southern Plastic Mold (Anaheim, CA).
Since they were introduced to the
United States in 1982, NAK steels have been used for thousands of
molds. Companies such as Apple Computer and General Motor's Inland
Fisher Guide Division (Dayton, OH) often specify NAK because of
anticipated design changes. Design changes to new parts typically
require modification of the tool.
Design changes are also often made
during the life of the part. An example is a horn pad that Hunt
Machine built for General Motors. After the mold was completed,
designers decided to relocate the bugles. "If we cut it in P-20, we
would have had to throw away the mold and start again" said Paul
Bryan, a tooling engineer at General Motors.
At Mold Expo '93 in Detroit, MI. last
month, International Mold Steels introduced another prehardened
steel for injection molds. Called PK5, it combines the weldability
and machinability of NAK with added toughness (Table 1).
Table 1. Properties of prehardened
mold steels
|
Steel |
Tensile strength (kgf/mm2) |
Yield strength (kgf/mm2) |
Hardness* |
Toughness†
(kgf-m/cm2) |
| PX5 |
100 |
88 |
32 |
8 |
| NAK
80 |
128 |
103 |
40 |
2 |
| P-20 |
100 |
88 |
32 |
5 |
| AISI
4140 |
95 |
75 |
25 |
5 |
*
Rockwell C
†Charpy
impact test
PX5 has the same hardness as P-20 (32
Rockwell C), but the hardness is more consistent through the entire
thickness. The steel's tensile and yield strengths are similar to
NAK and P-20. Although a quench and temper heat-treating process is
used in manufacturing PX5, the steel is quite stable. It can be
machined to size without the need to relieve stress on the block
before the finish cut. Figure 1 compares the machinability of PX5
with that of several common mold steels.
| The sacrifice in
hardness from NAK (40 Rockwell C) is made up for by higher
toughness. PX5 is 60% tougher than P-20. This improved toughness
allows increased design creativity and flexibility. What really makes PX5 unique is its
weldability. Welding this steel requires neither preheating nor
postheating (Figure 2), which greatly reduces welding time and,
of course, cost.
According to Ernie Beutel, vice
president of technical services for International Mold Steels,
the increase in hardness in the area heated during welding is
very low and distortion is minimal, resulting in low overall
repair time and cost. As with NAK steels, the weld can be
textured or polished with no observable difference in the
surface.
Since PX5 was introduced in Japan
about two years ago, hundreds of molds have been built with this
new steel. Hunt Machine learned about it several months ago and
has already built a mold for General Motors. According to Dave
Hunt, PX5 has lived up to its claims, and he confirms that it is
easy to machine and weld.
|

FIGURE 1. PX5 machines about 30%
faster than P-20 in both end mill (top) and drill (bottom)
comparisons. |
As with any new material, at least
one drawback must offset the benefits. The only one we heard about
is the cost. PX5 costs about twice as much as P-20. But because the
steel cost is only 5-10% of the total mold cost, the savings in
machining time and superior weldability more than make up the
difference.
Copyright © 1993
Advanstar Inc. All rights reserved.
|